Now as we see a large quantity of people are posting irrelevant information towards Tzu's unbanning. And some others are trying to create their own unbanning system.
I would like to suggest to Lugh to have a possible set of rules and possibly a template.
1st: the post shouldnt be made by the person being unbanned - if a player truely should be unbanned they should have someone to be able to approve and warrant a unbanning post.
2nd: votes are +1/-1 only - if someone wants to raise a point create a new thread that way the vote doesnt get locked.
3rd: tallys should be included by the original poster in the original message to allow others an easy reference to what they will be seeing soon.
4th: the votes should not be shorter than a week or longer than a month. The longer the vote the more severe the reason for banning.
5th: once the vote has been tallied and unban/ban verdict made - the original poster should delete the post or pm a moderator to lock it as it has exceeded its time period.
This would make things a little more fluid and easier when we unban players, imo.
Proposal for future unbanning votes
#1Lukov lvl 205 rogue
Lukov4 lvl 199 druid
Lukov2 lvl 63 warrior able to shield bash Aggy
Helpfullukov lvl 197 mage. Part three of the lukov combo
skywalker1 lvl 100 ranger
Expansion update 4 & destiny beta tester
Lukov4 lvl 199 druid
Lukov2 lvl 63 warrior able to shield bash Aggy
Helpfullukov lvl 197 mage. Part three of the lukov combo
skywalker1 lvl 100 ranger
Expansion update 4 & destiny beta tester